 Posted: Tue Sep 22, 2009 8:06 pm Post subject: |
|
| Hmmm... you do have a point there. Maybe this should be based on hits and replies... or maybe there is some mathematical quotient that we can use to determine the popularity by combining the two... | |
| Posted: Tue Sep 22, 2009 11:38 am Post subject: |
|
That's not exactly right... cause you're forgetting page views. Valerie's IRC channel, for instance, has only 12 replies... but over 16,000 page views!  Seems rather popular to me.  |
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2009 2:47 pm Post subject: |
|
Hey we never said these had to be honest counts?  |
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2009 12:55 am Post subject: |
|
| i seem to strike between 0 and 20 replies for mine, and the higher-ups owe their count to derailment (but then again dont they all) |
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 9:21 pm Post subject: Topic Status |
|
| I had a crazy idea about ranking various topics. I got this idea from the fact that Aoiga's "Currently Listening To..." thread is over 2000 posts now.
Iono, something like this: <10 replies: Unpopular. 10-20 replies: Readable 21-40 replies: Noteworthy 41-60 replies: Eye-catching 61-150 replies: Popular 151-200 replies: Very Popular 200+ replies: Legendary [Edit: and if a topic goes a week without any replies at all, label it "Dead on Arrival" ] |
|